It’s odd, the things having a crush makes one do (oh yes,
they make me. Honest.
I can’t resist, I’m putty in the hands of my urges. Ahem).
So, anyway - I bought a Dvd boxed set. Not a big one - all of two discs. Just ten episodes; that’s so sad. But at least now I understand what the fuss
was about, and why someone described this to me as the police procedural
equivalent of “Firefly”. It’s a good
analogy. Not only because both were shot
down in flames after just one series, but in terms of quality as well.
When the Dipgeek introduced me to “Firefly”, also on Dvd, it
took about fifteen minutes for me to be hooked, whereas this took the whole of
episode 1. This makes sense; I adore science
fiction, I’m mostly neutral towards police procedurals. In “Firefly”, the opening battle looked good;
then the titles were terrific, the dialogue was great, the ship’s engineer was not
a brawny bloke but a lass, yay! - and with the brilliant sequence on Persephone
the “grab Im” process was complete. I became a devoted Browncoat and have not deviated since.
With this, the key moments were the fact that at the first introduction
of the character played by Crush Of The Moment, he’s cooking – that’s a big yay! for me, unrepentant foodie that I am (plus
it creates the need for regular close-ups of his gorgeous hands, which is
definitely a Good Thing - I would happily be putty in those hands). Then, there’s
the presence of the ever-excellent Harold Perrineau; the fact that our heroine
is a jolie-laide rather than a tv-style
beauty – i.e. she looks like a human being, not a shop-window dummy; and the way
that the touches of humour are so lightly-handled and kept character-based. But it wasn’t until the end of the first
episode that I realised that, ever so quietly, I had been hooked and
landed. I was looking forward to some
more, and thinking grumpily “Why are there only ten episodes? What berk made that decision?” – and then I knew
that this wasn’t simply going to be a piece of Renner-Porn but a real find.
Honestly, there a must be some very silly people working in
executive-decision-making posts in television.
Why would anyone intelligent
choose to keep churning out some of the drivel that clogs tele screens all over
the developed world (naming no names – after all, tastes in drivel vary), and yet scrap “Firefly” and “The Unusuals”?? Can no-one ever take a well-worn trope and do
with it something just a wee bit fresh and different?
Why can’t a television series be primarily character-driven, rather than
ever-more-hysterically plot-contrivance-driven? What are they
so scared of? – actually entertaining us?
TV EXECUTIVE MORONS.
No comments:
Post a Comment